Protest 102215-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 102215-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.

3 Cust. Ct. 381

United States Customs Court·Decided September 8, 1939·No. No. 42084·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel articles «embroidered and in part of lace, similar to those involved in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), and laces like those the subject of Amrein v. United States (T. D. 49551) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protest 102215-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc., 3 Cust. Ct. 381 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 381 (Protest 102215-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related