Protest 100291-K of Olavarria & Co.

16 Cust. Ct. 249
United States Customs Court·Decided July 1, 1946·No. No. 50972·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the importer’s oath of short shipment was admitted in evidence for the sole purpose of establishing that it had been filed in compliance with the regulations. No attempt was made by the plaintiff to establish that there actually had been a nonimportation of the four bags of sugar in question. It was held that the plaintiff had failed to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. (Altman v. United States, 13 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 868, followed.) The protest was therefore overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protest 100291-K of Olavarria & Co., 16 Cust. Ct. 249 (cusc 1946).

16 Cust. Ct. 249 (Protest 100291-K of Olavarria & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

B. Altman & Co. v. United States
13 Cust. Ct. 56 (U.S. Customs Court, 1944)