Protest 100097-K of David Kannengiesser

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 100097-K of David Kannengiesser

12 Cust. Ct. 239

United States Customs Court·Decided January 5, 1944·No. No. 49116·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated by counsel that the banana flakes in question are the same in all material respects as those passed upon in Sardik v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 400, C. D. 646), the record in which case was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith they were held dutiable at 17K percent under paragraph 752, as amended by the trade agreements with Costa Rica (T. D. 49072) and Ecuador (T. D. 49710). Protest sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated by counsel that the banana flakes in question are the same in all material respects as those passed upon in Sardik v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 400, C. D. 646), the record in which case was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith they were held dutiable at 17K percent under paragraph 752, as amended by the trade agreements with Costa Rica (T. D. 49072) and Ecuador (T. D. 49710). Protest sustained to this extent.

Protest 100097-K of David Kannengiesser, 12 Cust. Ct. 239 (cusc 1944).

Pincite

12 Cust. Ct. 239 (Protest 100097-K of David Kannengiesser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related