Protest 100097-K of David Kannengiesser

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 100097-K of David Kannengiesser

12 Cust. Ct. 239

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 5, 1944

DocketNo. 49116

StatusPublished

This text of 12 Cust. Ct. 239 (Protest 100097-K of David Kannengiesser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 100097-K of David Kannengiesser, 12 Cust. Ct. 239 (cusc 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated by counsel that the banana flakes in question are the same in all material respects as those passed upon in Sardik v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 400, C. D. 646), the record in which case was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith they were held dutiable at 17K percent under paragraph 752, as amended by the trade agreements with Costa Rica (T. D. 49072) and Ecuador (T. D. 49710). Protest sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated by counsel that the banana flakes in question are the same in all material respects as those passed upon in Sardik v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 400, C. D. 646), the record in which case was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith they were held dutiable at 17K percent under paragraph 752, as amended by the trade agreements with Costa Rica (T. D. 49072) and Ecuador (T. D. 49710). Protest sustained to this extent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Cust. Ct. 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-100097-k-of-david-kannengiesser-cusc-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack