Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Protectors of Pine Oak Woods, Inc. v. City of New York

Protectors of Pine Oak Woods, Inc. v. City of New York

297 A.D.2d 323, 746 N.Y.2d 264, 746 N.Y.S.2d 264, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7913
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 12, 2002·Published

Opinion

As the Supreme Court correctly noted in its well-reasoned decision, there is no likelihood that the petitioners will succeed on the merits of their underlying petition. Thus, the Supreme Court providently denied the petitioners’ motion for a preliminary injunction (see CPLR 6311; Doe v Axelrod, 73 NY2d 748, 750; Grant Co. v Srogi, 52 NY2d 496, 517; Sheffield Towers Rehabilitation & Health Care Ctr. v Novello, 293 AD2d 182; Mosseri v Fried, 289 AD2d 545). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protectors of Pine Oak Woods, Inc. v. City of New York, 297 A.D.2d 323, 746 N.Y.2d 264, 746 N.Y.S.2d 264, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

297 A.D.2d 323 (Protectors of Pine Oak Woods, Inc. v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

W. T. Grant Co. v. Srogi
420 N.E.2d 953 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Doe v. Axelrod
532 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
Mosseri v. Fried
289 A.D.2d 545 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Sheffield Towers Rehabilitation & Health Care Center v. Novello
293 A.D.2d 182 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)