Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Prostack v. City of Schenectady

Prostack v. City of Schenectady

135 A.D.2d 887, 523 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52816
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 3, 1987
StatusPublished

This text of 135 A.D.2d 887 (Prostack v. City of Schenectady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prostack v. City of Schenectady, 135 A.D.2d 887, 523 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Mercure, J.), entered December 9, 1986 in Schenectady County, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Order affirmed, without costs, upon the opinion of Justice Thomas E. Mercure (see also, Scheer v Koubek, 70 NY2d 678). Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scheer v. Koubek
512 N.E.2d 309 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A.D.2d 887, 523 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prostack-v-city-of-schenectady-nyappdiv-1987.