Pross v. Anson

83 N.E.2d 16, 298 N.Y. 718
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 1948·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing briefs payable out of the fund; no opinion.

Concur: Ch. J., Lewis, CoNway, DesmoNd, Dye and Fuld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pross v. Anson, 83 N.E.2d 16, 298 N.Y. 718 (N.Y. 1948).

83 N.E.2d 16 (Pross v. Anson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Third Intermediate Accounting of Chemical Bank
90 Misc. 2d 727 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)
In re the Construction of the Will of Upjohn
107 N.E.2d 492 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)