PROSPORT CHIROPRACTIC & WELLNESS, INC., A/A/O VALDORAMA MIDY vs MGA INSURANCE COMPANY

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 31, 2022
Docket21-0798
StatusPublished

This text of PROSPORT CHIROPRACTIC & WELLNESS, INC., A/A/O VALDORAMA MIDY vs MGA INSURANCE COMPANY (PROSPORT CHIROPRACTIC & WELLNESS, INC., A/A/O VALDORAMA MIDY vs MGA INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
PROSPORT CHIROPRACTIC & WELLNESS, INC., A/A/O VALDORAMA MIDY vs MGA INSURANCE COMPANY, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

PROSPORT CHIROPRACTIC & WELLNESS, INC., A/A/O VALDORAMA MIDY,

Appellant, Case No. 5D21-798 v. LT Case No. 2015-CC-008099-O

MGA INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Decision filed May 31, 2022

Appeal from the County Court for Orange County, Elizabeth Starr, Judge.

Chad A. Barr, of Chad Bar Law, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant.

Rebecca L. Delaney, Scott W. Dutton and Christopher S. Dutton, of Dutton Law Group, PA, Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, EISNAUGLE and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
PROSPORT CHIROPRACTIC & WELLNESS, INC., A/A/O VALDORAMA MIDY vs MGA INSURANCE COMPANY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prosport-chiropractic-wellness-inc-aao-valdorama-midy-vs-mga-fladistctapp-2022.