Prospect Leasing Co. v. Delascio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Prospect Leasing Co. v. Delascio

188 A.D.2d 595, 591 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14495

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 A.D.2d 595 (Prospect Leasing Co. v. Delascio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prospect Leasing Co. v. Delascio, 188 A.D.2d 595, 591 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.), entered October 30, 1990, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for an order of attachment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s sole contention on appeal, he was not entitled to vacatur of the order of attachment merely because it was rendered more than 20 days after submission of the motion therefor (see, Kaminsky v Abrams, 51 Misc 2d 5, 8). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.), entered October 30, 1990, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for an order of attachment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s sole contention on appeal, he was not entitled to vacatur of the order of attachment merely because it was rendered more than 20 days after submission of the motion therefor (see, Kaminsky v Abrams, 51 Misc 2d 5, 8). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 A.D.2d 595, 591 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prospect-leasing-co-v-delascio-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack