Prospect Leasing Co. v. Delascio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Prospect Leasing Co. v. Delascio

188 A.D.2d 595, 591 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14495

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.), entered October 30, 1990, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for an order of attachment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s sole contention on appeal, he was not entitled to vacatur of the order of attachment merely because it was rendered more than 20 days after submission of the motion therefor (see, Kaminsky v Abrams, 51 Misc 2d 5, 8). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.), entered October 30, 1990, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for an order of attachment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s sole contention on appeal, he was not entitled to vacatur of the order of attachment merely because it was rendered more than 20 days after submission of the motion therefor (see, Kaminsky v Abrams, 51 Misc 2d 5, 8). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Prospect Leasing Co. v. Delascio, 188 A.D.2d 595, 591 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

188 A.D.2d 595 (Prospect Leasing Co. v. Delascio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related