Prospect Coal Co. v. Commercial Credit Corp.

161 Misc. 780, 293 N.Y.S. 231, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1493
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 15, 1937·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An assignment not otherwise shown invalid by a debtor to his judgment creditor of a credit in a bank account does not become invalid or subordinate to the claim of a prior judgment creditor who has merely served upon such bank a third-party order for examination in supplementary proceedings containing a restraining provision.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Hammer and Franken-THALER, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prospect Coal Co. v. Commercial Credit Corp., 161 Misc. 780, 293 N.Y.S. 231, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1493 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

161 Misc. 780 (Prospect Coal Co. v. Commercial Credit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neilson Realty Corp. v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
47 Misc. 2d 260 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
Cobbe v. Stowe
171 Misc. 687 (Delaware County Court, 1939)