Prosource Services Corp. v. Thomas Group, Inc.

687 So. 2d 75, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 396, 1997 WL 43851
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 1997·No. No. 96-2579·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Universal Employment Agency, 664 So.2d 1107, 1108 (Fla. 3d DCA1995)(dispute that has “its ‘origin or genesis in the contract,’ and was both ‘directly related to, and ... would not have occurred but for’ the relationship it established” subject to arbitration); Fowler v. Watts, 659 So.2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)(where subsequent superseding agreement does not include arbitration clause order compelling arbitration reversed); Trinchitella v. D.R.F., Inc., 584 So.2d 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)(same).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prosource Services Corp. v. Thomas Group, Inc., 687 So. 2d 75, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 396, 1997 WL 43851 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

687 So. 2d 75 (Prosource Services Corp. v. Thomas Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trinchitella v. DRF, INC.
584 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Royal Caribbean Cruises v. UNIVERSAL EMP.
664 So. 2d 1107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Fowler v. Watts
659 So. 2d 374 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)