Propst v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Propst v. State

934 S.W.2d 533, 326 Ark. 1102, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 722

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedDecember 23, 1996

DocketCR 96-633

StatusPublished

This text of 934 S.W.2d 533 (Propst v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Propst v. State, 934 S.W.2d 533, 326 Ark. 1102, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 722 (Ark. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Johnny Mark Propst, has been convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment. His attorney, Joe F. Atkinson Jr., requested and was granted a thirty-day extension to August 13, 1996, to file Appellant’s brief, but no brief has been filed.

Joe F. Atkinson Jr. is therefore ordered to appear before this court on the 27th day of January, 1997, at 9:00 a.m., to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this court for his failure to file Appellant’s brief in a timely manner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Johnny Mark Propst, has been convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment. His attorney, Joe F. Atkinson Jr., requested and was granted a thirty-day extension to August 13, 1996, to file Appellant’s brief, but no brief has been filed.

Joe F. Atkinson Jr. is therefore ordered to appear before this court on the 27th day of January, 1997, at 9:00 a.m., to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this court for his failure to file Appellant’s brief in a timely manner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

934 S.W.2d 533, 326 Ark. 1102, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/propst-v-state-ark-1996.