Proprietary v. Pearce
1 Md. 223
Opinion
[224] The motion did not prevail, the Chief Justice saying that the defendant would be barred of this defence, it being too late to have an imparlance,
Jennings’s notes.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Proprietary v. Pearce, 1 Md. 223 (Md. 1764).
1 Md. 223 (Proprietary v. Pearce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bruns v. Heise
60 A. 604 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1905)
Demill v. Reid
1 Balt. C. Rep. 21 (Baltimore City Circuit Court, 1889)
Durham v. Rhodes
23 Md. 233 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1865)
Reed v. Campbell
2 Hay. & Haz. 417 (D.C. Circuit, 1862)
Reed v. Campbell
20 F. Cas. 422 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1862)