Propp v. California

Supreme Court

Propp v. California

386 U.S. 275, 87 S. Ct. 1035, 18 L. Ed. 2d 44, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2050

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 13, 1967

Docket39, Misc

StatusPublished

This text of 386 U.S. 275 (Propp v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Propp v. California, 386 U.S. 275, 87 S. Ct. 1035, 18 L. Ed. 2d 44, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2050 (1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are. granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are. granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

386 U.S. 275, 87 S. Ct. 1035, 18 L. Ed. 2d 44, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/propp-v-california-scotus-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack