Prophet v. State
153 N.E.2d 918, 238 Ind. 711, 1958 Ind. LEXIS 301
Opinion
Petitioner, appearing pro se, files under the above caption what he designates as a “Petition for Leave to Appeal.” He states a motion for a new trial was overruled September 23, 1958 in the cause in which he was convicted. This is not a petition for a belated appeal. It is obvious the. petition is not of a character which confers any jurisdiction on this court.
Petition dismissed.
Note.—Reported in 153 N. E. 2d 918.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Prophet v. State, 153 N.E.2d 918, 238 Ind. 711, 1958 Ind. LEXIS 301 (Ind. 1958).
153 N.E.2d 918 (Prophet v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Craig v. Schannen
153 N.E.2d 918 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1958)