Prophet Paulcin v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 12, 2015
Docket15-0766
StatusPublished

This text of Prophet Paulcin v. State of Florida (Prophet Paulcin v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prophet Paulcin v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

PROPHET PAULCIN, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D15-0766

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed March 12, 2015.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original Jurisdiction.

Prophet Paulcin, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

THOMAS, CLARK, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Prophet Paulcin v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prophet-paulcin-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2015.