Property Clerk of Police Department v. Plaskett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Property Clerk of Police Department v. Plaskett

40 A.D.3d 231, 833 N.Y.S.2d 385

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 1, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 A.D.3d 231 (Property Clerk of Police Department v. Plaskett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Property Clerk of Police Department v. Plaskett, 40 A.D.3d 231, 833 N.Y.S.2d 385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of respondent Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings, dated September 8, 2005, which directed petitioner Police Department to return to respondent Beverly Plaskett a vehicle seized incident to the arrest of respondent Gregory Plaskett, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Martin Shulman, J.], entered December 8, 2005) dismissed, without costs.

The finding of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings that Beverly Plaskett was an innocent owner is supported by substantial evidence (see Property Clerk, N.Y. City Police [232]*232Dept. v Pagano, 170 AD2d 30, 36 [1991]). Concur—Marlow, J.P., Nardelli, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of respondent Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings, dated September 8, 2005, which directed petitioner Police Department to return to respondent Beverly Plaskett a vehicle seized incident to the arrest of respondent Gregory Plaskett, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Martin Shulman, J.], entered December 8, 2005) dismissed, without costs.

The finding of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings that Beverly Plaskett was an innocent owner is supported by substantial evidence (see Property Clerk, N.Y. City Police [232]*232Dept. v Pagano, 170 AD2d 30, 36 [1991]). Concur—Marlow, J.P., Nardelli, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.3d 231, 833 N.Y.S.2d 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/property-clerk-of-police-department-v-plaskett-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack