Property Asset Management, Inc. v. S&R Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Property Asset Management, Inc. v. S&R Associates

238 A.D.2d 328, 656 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3417

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 7, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 238 A.D.2d 328 (Property Asset Management, Inc. v. S&R Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Property Asset Management, Inc. v. S&R Associates, 238 A.D.2d 328, 656 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3417 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has an easement over property owned by the defendant Saul Muchnick Irrevocable Trust, and for damages for misrepresentation and fraud, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), dated April 1, 1996, which granted the motion by the defendant Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint against the defendant Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman (see, Metral v Horn, 213 AD2d 524; Marine Midland Bank v Renck, 208 AD2d 688; see also, Tycon I Inv. v Burgee Architects, 234 AD2d 748). Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has an easement over property owned by the defendant Saul Muchnick Irrevocable Trust, and for damages for misrepresentation and fraud, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), dated April 1, 1996, which granted the motion by the defendant Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint against the defendant Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman (see, Metral v Horn, 213 AD2d 524; Marine Midland Bank v Renck, 208 AD2d 688; see also, Tycon I Inv. v Burgee Architects, 234 AD2d 748). Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D.2d 328, 656 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/property-asset-management-inc-v-sr-associates-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack