Proofpoint, Inc. v. Vade Secure, Incorporated

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 PROOFPOINT, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-04238-MMC (RMI)

9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 10 v. COMPEL

11 VADE SECURE, INCORPORATED, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 192 12 Defendants.

13 14 On July 10, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Compel (dkt. 192) nonparty Github Inc. 15 (“Github”) to comply with the Rule 45 subpoena duces tecum served on February 18, 2020. Prior 16 to filing the instant motion, Plaintiffs attempted to meet and confer with Github on four separate 17 occasions to no avail. Id. at 2. Github has not filed an opposition to the Motion. Pursuant to 18 General Order 72-5 and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the court finds that Plaintiffs’ Motion is 19 appropriate for decision without oral argument and hereby VACATES the hearing set for August 20 6, 2020. 21 Rule 45 requires that all objections to a subpoena to “produce documents or tangible 22 things” must be served “before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the 23 subpoena is served.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(2)(B). “‘Failure to serve timely objections waives all 24 grounds for objection.’” Poturich v. Allstate Ins. Co., No. EDCV150081GWKKX, 2015 WL 25 12766048, at *2 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2015) (quoting McCoy v. Sw. Airlines Co., 211 F.R.D. 381, 26 385 (C.D. Cal. 2002)) (emphasis added). 27 Github failed to file objections to the Rule 45 subpoena, and thus, it has waived all 1 within the time required and hence, has waived any objections.”). Accordingly, it is hereby 2 ORDERED that Github shall comply with Rule 45 and respond to the subpoena and produce all 3 || responsive documents without objections in accordance with the undersigned’s Order (dkt. 188) 4 no later than August 10, 2020. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 || Dated: August 3, 2020 7 8 ROBHRT M. ILLMAN 9 United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28