Promega Corp. v. Life Technologies Corp.

Federal Circuit

Promega Corp. v. Life Technologies Corp.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Promega Corp. v. Life Technologies Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 674 F.3d 1352 →

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 6, 2011·No. 2011-1263·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit PROMEGA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, 1 AND MAX-PLANCK-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FORDERUNG DER W'ISSENSCHAFTEN E.V., Plain,tiff, V. LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, INVITROGEN IP HOLDINGS, INC., AND APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS, LLC, Defen,dants-Appellees. 2011-1263 Appea1 from the United States District Court for the Weste1'n District of Wisc0nsin in case no. 10-CV-0281, Senior Judge Barbara B. Crabb. ON MOTION ORDER

PROMEGA CORP V. LIFE TECH 2 Life Techn01ogies Corporation, Invitr0gen IP Ho1d- ings, Inc., and App1ied Biosysterns, LLC, move to with- draw Kurtis D. MacFerrin as counsel of record Upon consideration thereof IT ls 0RDERED THAT: The motion is granted gm 0 6 2011 Date ccc Ja1nes R. Tr0upis, Esq. Francis M. Wikstr0m, Esq. Kurtis D. MacFerrin, Esq. s21 FOR THE COURT /S/ J an H0rba1y J an H0rba1y C1erk FILED u.s. count rs-re FEo€§A'i_PciiEA union Ls nc OCT 0 6 2011 .|AN HORBALY CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit PROMEGA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, 1 AND MAX-PLANCK-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FORDERUNG DER W'ISSENSCHAFTEN E.V., Plain,tiff, V. LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, INVITROGEN IP HOLDINGS, INC., AND APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS, LLC, Defen,dants-Appellees. 2011-1263 Appea1 from the United States District Court for the Weste1'n District of Wisc0nsin in case no. 10-CV-0281, Senior Judge Barbara B. Crabb. ON MOTION ORDER

PROMEGA CORP V. LIFE TECH 2 Life Techn01ogies Corporation, Invitr0gen IP Ho1d- ings, Inc., and App1ied Biosysterns, LLC, move to with- draw Kurtis D. MacFerrin as counsel of record Upon consideration thereof IT ls 0RDERED THAT: The motion is granted gm 0 6 2011 Date ccc Ja1nes R. Tr0upis, Esq. Francis M. Wikstr0m, Esq. Kurtis D. MacFerrin, Esq. s21 FOR THE COURT /S/ J an H0rba1y J an H0rba1y C1erk FILED u.s. count rs-re FEo€§A'i_PciiEA union Ls nc OCT 0 6 2011 .|AN HORBALY CLERK

Promega Corp. v. Life Technologies Corp., (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Promega Corp. v. Life Technologies Corp. (Promega Corp. v. Life Technologies Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.