Promed Durable Equip., Inc. v. MVAIC

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJuly 12, 2019
Docket2019 NYSlipOp 51152(U)
StatusPublished

This text of Promed Durable Equip., Inc. v. MVAIC (Promed Durable Equip., Inc. v. MVAIC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Promed Durable Equip., Inc. v. MVAIC, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion



Promed Durable Equipment, Inc., as Assignee of Shaerah Harkless, Respondent,

against

MVAIC, Appellant.


Marshall & Marshall, PLLC (Barbara Carabell of counsel), for appellant. Law Office of Emilia I. Rutigliano, P.C., for respondent (no brief filed).

Appeal from a decision of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Maureen A. Healy, J.), dated May 14, 2015, and from a judgment of that court entered September 30, 2015. The judgment, entered pursuant to the decision, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $2,655.

ORDERED that so much of the appeal as is from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies therefrom (see CCA 1702); and it is further,

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.

After a nonjury trial in this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the Civil Court awarded judgment to plaintiff in the principal sum of $2,655.

The evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to establish that plaintiff had exhausted its remedies against the vehicle's owner (see Matter of Acosta-Collado v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 103 AD3d 714 [2013]; Hauswirth v American Home Assur. Co., 244 AD2d 528 [1997]). As a result, plaintiff's claim is premature (see Matter of Acosta-Collado, 103 AD3d 714; Hauswirth, 244 AD2d 528; Dr. Abakin, D.C., P.C. v MVAIC, 21 Misc 3d 134[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 52186[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2008]; see also Matter of Sweet v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 287 AD2d 510 [2001]; Matter of Troches v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 171 AD2d 873 [1991]).

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.

PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: July 12, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Troches v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
171 A.D.2d 873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Hauswirth v. American Home Assurance Co.
244 A.D.2d 528 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Sweet v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
287 A.D.2d 510 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Promed Durable Equip., Inc. v. MVAIC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/promed-durable-equip-inc-v-mvaic-nyappterm-2019.