Prokopowicz v. 11 West 42nd Street, Inc.
This text of 45 N.E.2d 906 (Prokopowicz v. 11 West 42nd Street, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Even without direct proof that the installation of an additional safety device on electrical elevators was customary in 1926, a question of fact is presented whether the defendant Otis Elevator Company acted negligently in failing to install such device under the circumstances shown by the evidence produced by the plaintiff.
The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur.
Judgments reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 N.E.2d 906, 289 N.Y. 350, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prokopowicz-v-11-west-42nd-street-inc-ny-1942.