Prokop v. Jacks Bean Co.
This text of 463 N.W.2d 628 (Prokop v. Jacks Bean Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff-appellant, James E. Prokop, Sr., brought this action against Jacks Bean Company to recover damages for breach of an alleged oral contract for the sale of Prokop’s beans to Jacks. Prokop has appealed the order of the district court which entered summary judgment in favor of Jacks.
This case involves the same defendant as in Joseph Heiting & Sons v. Jacks Bean Co., ante p. 765, 463 N.W.2d 817 (1990), as well as a similar set of facts and identical questions of law. Accordingly, because Heiting is controlling, the judgment herein is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Heiting.
Reversed and remanded for FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
463 N.W.2d 628, 236 Neb. 774, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prokop-v-jacks-bean-co-neb-1990.