Prokop v. Jacks Bean Co.

463 N.W.2d 628, 236 Neb. 774, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 372
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided December 14, 1990·No. No. 88-775·Published

Opinion

Hastings, C.J.

Plaintiff-appellant, James E. Prokop, Sr., brought this action against Jacks Bean Company to recover damages for breach of an alleged oral contract for the sale of Prokop’s beans to Jacks. Prokop has appealed the order of the district court which entered summary judgment in favor of Jacks.

This case involves the same defendant as in Joseph Heiting & Sons v. Jacks Bean Co., ante p. 765, 463 N.W.2d 817 (1990), as well as a similar set of facts and identical questions of law. Accordingly, because Heiting is controlling, the judgment herein is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Heiting.

Reversed and remanded for FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prokop v. Jacks Bean Co., 463 N.W.2d 628, 236 Neb. 774, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 372 (Neb. 1990).

463 N.W.2d 628 (Prokop v. Jacks Bean Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Joseph Heiting and Sons v. Jacks Bean Co.
463 N.W.2d 817 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1990)