Prokhorova v. Kasimis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Prokhorova v. Kasimis

104 A.D.3d 561, 960 N.Y.S.2d 647

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 2013·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered September 26, 2011, which, inter alia, granted defendant the City’s motion to deem it in compliance with a prior order, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Having certified that discovery was complete, plaintiffs are barred from challenging the motion court’s determination that the City fully complied with the March 24, 2011 order by producing two knowledgeable witnesses (see Bookazine Co. v J & A Bindery, 61 AD2d 919, 919 [1st Dept 1978]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Saxe, Moskowitz and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered September 26, 2011, which, inter alia, granted defendant the City’s motion to deem it in compliance with a prior order, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Having certified that discovery was complete, plaintiffs are barred from challenging the motion court’s determination that the City fully complied with the March 24, 2011 order by producing two knowledgeable witnesses (see Bookazine Co. v J & A Bindery, 61 AD2d 919, 919 [1st Dept 1978]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Saxe, Moskowitz and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Prokhorova v. Kasimis, 104 A.D.3d 561, 960 N.Y.S.2d 647 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

104 A.D.3d 561 (Prokhorova v. Kasimis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related