Prokhorova v. Kasimis

104 A.D.3d 561, 960 N.Y.S.2d 647

This text of 104 A.D.3d 561 (Prokhorova v. Kasimis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prokhorova v. Kasimis, 104 A.D.3d 561, 960 N.Y.S.2d 647 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered September 26, 2011, which, inter alia, granted defendant the City’s motion to deem it in compliance with a prior order, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Having certified that discovery was complete, plaintiffs are barred from challenging the motion court’s determination that the City fully complied with the March 24, 2011 order by producing two knowledgeable witnesses (see Bookazine Co. v J & A Bindery, 61 AD2d 919, 919 [1st Dept 1978]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Saxe, Moskowitz and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bookazine Co. v. J & A Bindery, Inc.
61 A.D.2d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 A.D.3d 561, 960 N.Y.S.2d 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prokhorova-v-kasimis-nyappdiv-2013.