Project Sentinel v. Komar
Opinion
PROJECT SENTINEL, Case No. 1:19-cv-00708-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS AGAINST JEANETTE KOMAR, et al., DEFENDANT SARAH KOMAR WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendants. (ECF No. 91) On July 6, 2021, Plaintiff Project Sentinel (“Plaintiff”) filed a request for dismissal of all claims against Defendant Sarah Komar without prejudice. (ECF No. 91.) Defendant Sarah Komar has not filed either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, and Plaintiff does not request a court order imposing any terms beyond dismissal without prejudice and for each party to bear their own fees and costs. (See id.) Therefore, although styled as a request for dismissal, the Court construes Plaintiff’s request as a notice of dismissal of Sarah Komar without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). /// /// /// /// /// In light of the notice, the case against Defendant Sarah Komar has ended and is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). All other defendants in this case have previously been dismissed or judgment has been entered against them. (ECF Nos. 76, 88, 89.) Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. Dated: _ July 7, 2021 [sf ey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Project Sentinel v. Komar (Project Sentinel v. Komar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.