Proie Brothers, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation and John Proie v. Frank Proie

Third Circuit

Proie Brothers, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation and John Proie v. Frank Proie

414 F.2d 1365, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12372

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 15, 1969·No. 17701_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In this suit for breach of contract where the jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs, defendant challenges the District Court judgment of October 18, 1968, entered on the verdict, and its order of December 3, 1968, denying a new trial sought due to alleged error in the denial by the trial judge of a motion made on the last day of the trial to amend the Answer by adding an alternative defense based on facts allegedly known to all parties for many years prior to trial.

After careful consideration of the record, as well as the able briefs and oral arguments of counsel, we will affirm the District Court judgment of October 18, 1968, for the reasons clearly stated in the December 3, 1968, opinion of Judge Marsh, 301 F.Supp. 680. 1

1

. Also, we note the following recent case cited by counsel during the oral argument: Albee Homes, Inc. v. Lutman, 406 F.2d 11, 13-14 (3rd Cir. 1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In this suit for breach of contract where the jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs, defendant challenges the District Court judgment of October 18, 1968, entered on the verdict, and its order of December 3, 1968, denying a new trial sought due to alleged error in the denial by the trial judge of a motion made on the last day of the trial to amend the Answer by adding an alternative defense based on facts allegedly known to all parties for many years prior to trial.

After careful consideration of the record, as well as the able briefs and oral arguments of counsel, we will affirm the District Court judgment of October 18, 1968, for the reasons clearly stated in the December 3, 1968, opinion of Judge Marsh, 301 F.Supp. 680. 1

1

. Also, we note the following recent case cited by counsel during the oral argument: Albee Homes, Inc. v. Lutman, 406 F.2d 11, 13-14 (3rd Cir. 1969).

Proie Brothers, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation and John Proie v. Frank Proie, 414 F.2d 1365, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12372 (3d Cir. 1969).

Pincite

414 F.2d 1365 (Proie Brothers, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation and John Proie v. Frank Proie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related