Prohaska v. Moutz
348 So. 2d 1225, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22519
Opinion
Affirmed. See Davidson v. Davis, 59 Fla. 476, 52 So. 139 (1910); Nelson v. Scarritt [1226]*1226Motors, Inc. et al., 48 So.2d 168 (Fla.1950); Dillon v. J. W. Walter, Inc., 98 So.2d 391 (Fla. 1 DCA 1957); Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Staines, 161 So.2d 569 (Fla. 2 DCA 1964).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Prohaska v. Moutz, 348 So. 2d 1225, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22519 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
348 So. 2d 1225 (Prohaska v. Moutz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Staines
161 So. 2d 569 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Nelson v. Scarritt Motors
48 So. 2d 168 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1950)
Davidson v. Davis
59 Fla. 476 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1910)
Dillon v. J. W. Walter, Inc.
98 So. 2d 391 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)