Prohaska v. Moutz

348 So. 2d 1225, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22519
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 29, 1977
DocketNo. EE-309
StatusPublished

This text of 348 So. 2d 1225 (Prohaska v. Moutz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prohaska v. Moutz, 348 So. 2d 1225, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22519 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Davidson v. Davis, 59 Fla. 476, 52 So. 139 (1910); Nelson v. Scarritt [1226]*1226Motors, Inc. et al., 48 So.2d 168 (Fla.1950); Dillon v. J. W. Walter, Inc., 98 So.2d 391 (Fla. 1 DCA 1957); Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Staines, 161 So.2d 569 (Fla. 2 DCA 1964).

RAWLS, Acting C. J., BOYER, J., and MASON, ERNEST E., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Staines
161 So. 2d 569 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Nelson v. Scarritt Motors
48 So. 2d 168 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1950)
Davidson v. Davis
59 Fla. 476 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1910)
Dillon v. J. W. Walter, Inc.
98 So. 2d 391 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 So. 2d 1225, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prohaska-v-moutz-fladistctapp-1977.