ProgressOhio.Org, Inc. v. JobsOhio

Ohio Supreme Court

ProgressOhio.Org, Inc. v. JobsOhio

986 N.E.2d 27, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1410

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 24, 2013

Docket2012-1272

StatusPublished

This text of 986 N.E.2d 27 (ProgressOhio.Org, Inc. v. JobsOhio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ProgressOhio.Org, Inc. v. JobsOhio, 986 N.E.2d 27, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1410 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 11AP-1136, 2012-Ohio-2655. On motion to withdraw Victoria E. Ullmann as counsel for ProgressOhio.org, Inc. in order to be made a party/appellant in this action. Motion granted in part. The withdrawal of counsel is granted and the request to be made a party is denied.

On motion to require counsel for the 1851 Center to file proof of compliance with rules of conduct for the bar regarding improper contact with a represented party and conflict of interest or withdraw from the case. Motion denied.

Motion to strike Victoria E. Ullmann’s motion to withdraw and motion to dismiss and strike Victoria E. Ullmann’s motion to require counsel for the 1851 Center to file proof of compliance with rules of conduct for the bar are denied as moot.

O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 11AP-1136, 2012-Ohio-2655. On motion to withdraw Victoria E. Ullmann as counsel for ProgressOhio.org, Inc. in order to be made a party/appellant in this action. Motion granted in part. The withdrawal of counsel is granted and the request to be made a party is denied.

On motion to require counsel for the 1851 Center to file proof of compliance with rules of conduct for the bar regarding improper contact with a represented party and conflict of interest or withdraw from the case. Motion denied.

Motion to strike Victoria E. Ullmann’s motion to withdraw and motion to dismiss and strike Victoria E. Ullmann’s motion to require counsel for the 1851 Center to file proof of compliance with rules of conduct for the bar are denied as moot.

O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

986 N.E.2d 27, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/progressohioorg-inc-v-jobsohio-ohio-2013.