Progressive Specialty Insurance v. Alexis

90 A.D.3d 933, 934 N.Y.2d 719
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 20, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 90 A.D.3d 933 (Progressive Specialty Insurance v. Alexis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Progressive Specialty Insurance v. Alexis, 90 A.D.3d 933, 934 N.Y.2d 719 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the petition which was to direct disclosure in aid of arbitration pursuant to CPLR 3102 (c), as the petitioner failed to demonstrate that “extraordinary circumstances” existed such that this relief would be absolutely necessary for the protection of its rights (De Sapio v Kohlmeyer, 35 NY2d 402, 406 [1974] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Morris, 83 AD3d 709, 710 [2011]; Matter of Travelers [934]*934Indem. Co. v United Diagnostic Imaging, P.C., 73 AD3d 791, 791-792 [2010]). Angiolillo, J.E, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. (Twomey)
2021 NY Slip Op 05418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Weisz v. Weisz
42 Misc. 3d 391 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)
AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPAN v. KALINA, RICHARD
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
AXA Equitable Life Insurance v. Kalina
101 A.D.3d 1655 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 A.D.3d 933, 934 N.Y.2d 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/progressive-specialty-insurance-v-alexis-nyappdiv-2011.