Progressive Specialty Insurance v. Alexis
This text of 90 A.D.3d 933 (Progressive Specialty Insurance v. Alexis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the petition which was to direct disclosure in aid of arbitration pursuant to CPLR 3102 (c), as the petitioner failed to demonstrate that “extraordinary circumstances” existed such that this relief would be absolutely necessary for the protection of its rights (De Sapio v Kohlmeyer, 35 NY2d 402, 406 [1974] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Morris, 83 AD3d 709, 710 [2011]; Matter of Travelers [934]*934Indem. Co. v United Diagnostic Imaging, P.C., 73 AD3d 791, 791-792 [2010]). Angiolillo, J.E, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A.D.3d 933, 934 N.Y.2d 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/progressive-specialty-insurance-v-alexis-nyappdiv-2011.