Progressive Select Insurance Co. v. Florida Emergency Physicians

183 So. 3d 489, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1531, 2016 WL 435729
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 2016·No. No. 5D15-3718·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Progressive Select Insurance Company (“Progressive”) seeks certiorari review of a final order of the circuit court, sitting in its appellate capacity. The circuit court affirmed the county court’s ruling that, under our PIP statute, a provider of emergency services, such as Florida’s Emergency Physicians (“FEP”), that timely submits its bill within the thirty-day window contemplated by section 627.736(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2012), is entitled to have its bill paid, regardless of the existence of a deductible in the insured’s insurance contract.1

In Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company v. Emergency Physicians of Central Florida, LLP, 178 So.3d 927 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015), and Mercury Insurance Co. v. Emergency Physicians of Central Florida, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D2364, 182 So.3d 661, 2015 WL 6022040 (Fla. 5th DCA Oct. 16, 2015), we have recently rejected this position and quashed identical orders. As in Metropolitan Casualty and Mercury Insurance, we grant the writ and quash the circuit court’s order.

PETITION for WRIT OF CERTIORA-RI GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED.

ORFINGER, BERGER, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Progressive Select Insurance Co. v. Florida Emergency Physicians, 183 So. 3d 489, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1531, 2016 WL 435729 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

183 So. 3d 489 (Progressive Select Insurance Co. v. Florida Emergency Physicians) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Progressive Express Insurance Co. v. Emergency Physicians of Central Florida
187 So. 3d 1278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)