Progressive Northwestern Insurance v. Gjonaj

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Progressive Northwestern Insurance v. Gjonaj

43 A.D.3d 1169, 841 N.Y.S.2d 794

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 25, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 43 A.D.3d 1169 (Progressive Northwestern Insurance v. Gjonaj) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Progressive Northwestern Insurance v. Gjonaj, 43 A.D.3d 1169, 841 N.Y.S.2d 794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, Prec Gjonaj and Lena Popovic appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Friedman, J.H.O.), dated January 11, 2006, which granted the petition, and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court entered March 31, 2006, as, upon reargument, in effect, adhered to the prior determination, and the petitioner cross-appeals from so much of the order entered March 31, 2006, as, upon reargument, struck the word “permanently” from the order dated January 11, 2006.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated January 11, 2006 is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order entered March 31, 2006, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered March 31, 2006 is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, and upon re-argument, the order dated January 11, 2006 is vacated, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed as academic in light of our determination on the appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the appellants-respondents.

[1170]*1170The petitioner’s failure to meet its initial burden of showing that the offending vehicle was, in fact, insured on the date of the accident mandated denial of the petition and dismissal of the proceeding {see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Holloway, 272 AD2d 539, 539-540 [2000]; Matter of Eagle Ins. Co. v McPherson, 271 AD2d 689 [2000]; Matter of Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v Campbell, 227 AD2d 628 [1996]; Matter of Eagle Ins. Co. v Battershield, 225 AD2d 545 [1996]; cf. Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Youngblood, 270 AD2d 493, 493-494 [2000]). Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Skelos and Garni, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, Prec Gjonaj and Lena Popovic appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Friedman, J.H.O.), dated January 11, 2006, which granted the petition, and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court entered March 31, 2006, as, upon reargument, in effect, adhered to the prior determination, and the petitioner cross-appeals from so much of the order entered March 31, 2006, as, upon reargument, struck the word “permanently” from the order dated January 11, 2006.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated January 11, 2006 is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order entered March 31, 2006, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered March 31, 2006 is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, and upon re-argument, the order dated January 11, 2006 is vacated, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed as academic in light of our determination on the appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the appellants-respondents.

[1170]*1170The petitioner’s failure to meet its initial burden of showing that the offending vehicle was, in fact, insured on the date of the accident mandated denial of the petition and dismissal of the proceeding {see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Holloway, 272 AD2d 539, 539-540 [2000]; Matter of Eagle Ins. Co. v McPherson, 271 AD2d 689 [2000]; Matter of Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v Campbell, 227 AD2d 628 [1996]; Matter of Eagle Ins. Co. v Battershield, 225 AD2d 545 [1996]; cf. Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Youngblood, 270 AD2d 493, 493-494 [2000]). Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Skelos and Garni, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.3d 1169, 841 N.Y.S.2d 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/progressive-northwestern-insurance-v-gjonaj-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack