Progressive Northern Insurance v. Henry

4 A.3d 153, 607 Pa. 94, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2013
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 8, 2010·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The order of the Superior Court dated June 4, 2009, reversing the order of the Court of Common Pleas of York County is hereby VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED for the Superior Court to affirm the order of the trial court and to direct the trial court to reinstate the award entered by the arbitration panel. See generally Kvaener Metals Division of Kvaener U.S., Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 589 Pa. 317, 908 A.2d 888, 897 (2006) (stating that a court must give effect to policy language that is clear and unambiguous; alternatively when a policy provision is ambiguous, the policy must be construed in favor of the insured and against the insurer which drafts the contract).

Justice SAYLOR files a Dissenting Statement which Chief Justice CASTILLE joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Progressive Northern Insurance v. Henry, 4 A.3d 153, 607 Pa. 94, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2013 (Pa. 2010).

4 A.3d 153 (Progressive Northern Insurance v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hostler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
44 A.3d 26 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Commonwealth v. Hamer
24 A.3d 359 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Commonwealth v. Ruggiano
26 A.3d 473 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Mashas v. Sucich
18 A.3d 1146 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Commonwealth v. Travillion
17 A.3d 1247 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)