Progressive Northern Insurance v. Henry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Progressive Northern Insurance v. Henry

4 A.3d 153, 607 Pa. 94, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2013

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 8, 2010

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 4 A.3d 153 (Progressive Northern Insurance v. Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Progressive Northern Insurance v. Henry, 4 A.3d 153, 607 Pa. 94, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2013 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The order of the Superior Court dated June 4, 2009, reversing the order of the Court of Common Pleas of York County is hereby VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED for the Superior Court to affirm the order of the trial court and to direct the trial court to reinstate the award entered by the arbitration panel. See generally Kvaener Metals Division of Kvaener U.S., Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 589 Pa. 317, 908 A.2d 888, 897 (2006) (stating that a court must give effect to policy language that is clear and unambiguous; alternatively when a policy provision is ambiguous, the policy must be construed in favor of the insured and against the insurer which drafts the contract).

Justice SAYLOR files a Dissenting Statement which Chief Justice CASTILLE joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The order of the Superior Court dated June 4, 2009, reversing the order of the Court of Common Pleas of York County is hereby VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED for the Superior Court to affirm the order of the trial court and to direct the trial court to reinstate the award entered by the arbitration panel. See generally Kvaener Metals Division of Kvaener U.S., Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 589 Pa. 317, 908 A.2d 888, 897 (2006) (stating that a court must give effect to policy language that is clear and unambiguous; alternatively when a policy provision is ambiguous, the policy must be construed in favor of the insured and against the insurer which drafts the contract).

Justice SAYLOR files a Dissenting Statement which Chief Justice CASTILLE joins.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.3d 153, 607 Pa. 94, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/progressive-northern-insurance-v-henry-pa-2010.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack