Progressive Northeastern Insurance v. Akinyooye

70 A.D.3d 956, 893 N.Y.S.2d 882

This text of 70 A.D.3d 956 (Progressive Northeastern Insurance v. Akinyooye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Progressive Northeastern Insurance v. Akinyooye, 70 A.D.3d 956, 893 N.Y.S.2d 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75, inter alia, to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), entered December 18, 2008, which, upon an order of the same court dated October 24, 2008, denying that branch of the petition which was to permanently stay arbitration, dismissed the proceeding with prejudice and, in effect, directed the parties to proceed to arbitration.

[957]*957Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Supreme Court properly found, upon documentary submissions in lieu of a framed-issue hearing, that Allstate Insurance Company demonstrated that its insured was provided with a notice of intent to cancel and a cancellation notice fully compliant with Banting Law § 576, more than one year prior to the subject accident (see Crump v Unigard Ins. Co., 100 NY2d 12, 16 [2003]; Nassau Ins. Co. v Murray, 46 NY2d 828, 829-830 [1978]; St. Vincent’s Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 50 AD3d 1123, 1124 [2008]; Matter of Autoone Ins. Co. v Zanders, 50 AD3d 682 [2008]; Shia v McFarlane, 46 AD3d 320, 321 [2007]; Residential Holding Corp. v Scottsdale Ins. Co., 286 AD2d 679, 680 [2001]; Allstate Ins. Co. v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 115 AD2d 264, 265 [1985]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly, in effect, directed the parties to proceed to arbitration.

The petitioner’s remaining contention is without merit. Skelos, J.P., Covello, Baltin and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crump v. Unigard Insurance
790 N.E.2d 244 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)
Nassau Insurance v. Murray
386 N.E.2d 1085 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Shia v. McFarlane
46 A.D.3d 320 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Autoone Insurance v. Zanders
50 A.D.3d 682 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
St. Vincent's Hospital v. Government Employees Insurance
50 A.D.3d 1123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Allstate Insurance v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
115 A.D.2d 264 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Residential Holding Corp. v. Scottsdale Insurance
286 A.D.2d 679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 A.D.3d 956, 893 N.Y.S.2d 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/progressive-northeastern-insurance-v-akinyooye-nyappdiv-2010.