Progressive Handlanger Union v. German Savings Bank

7 N.Y.S. 3, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 908
The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo·Decided May 13, 1889·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Sedgwick, C. J.

The application should be granted, under section 259, c.

409, Laws 1882. That section contemplates that, as in the present case, an action at law may be brought by a person in whose name the account with the bank is, and then, that a third person may claim the deposits as a fund equitably belonging to the third person, and that in such a case the section should be applied. 1 have a little doubt as to whether the claimant actually claims the whole of the deposit. If this be so, I am of the opinion that the section will still apply. Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Progressive Handlanger Union v. German Savings Bank, 7 N.Y.S. 3, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 908 (superctny 1889).

7 N.Y.S. 3 (Progressive Handlanger Union v. German Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Du Bois v. Union Dime Sav. Inst.
35 N.Y.S. 397 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Progressive Handlanger Union No. 1 v. German Savings Bank
8 N.Y.S. 545 (Superior Court of New York, 1890)