Progressive Express Insurance Company v. Olivia Oney

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 28, 2025
Docket3D2024-1618
StatusPublished

This text of Progressive Express Insurance Company v. Olivia Oney (Progressive Express Insurance Company v. Olivia Oney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Progressive Express Insurance Company v. Olivia Oney, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed May 28, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-1618 Lower Tribunal No. 21-13391-CA-01 ________________

Progressive Express Insurance Company, Appellant,

vs.

Olivia Oney, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Tanya Brinkley, Judge.

Young, Bill, Boles, Palmer, Duke & Thompson, P.A., Max Tsoy, Richard A. Weldy, and Adam A. Duke, for appellant.

The Haggard Law Firm, P.A., and James C. Blecke, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Harmon v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 232 So. 2d 206,

207-08 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970) (“It is generally held that where multiple claims

arise out of one accident, the liability insurer has the right to enter

reasonable settlements[.] . . . [T]he policy [is] encouraging compromises

and speedy settlements[.]” (Emphasis added)); Aldana v. Progressive Am.

Ins. Co., 828 Fed. Appx. 663, 671 (11th Cir. 2020) (“Moreover, by the end

of April 2014, more than four months after the collision, Progressive's

pursuit of a global settlement had gone nowhere. . . . Progressive . . . failed

to act with ‘any haste in attempting to get this matter resolved[.]’”); Farinas

v. Fla. Farm Bureau Gen. Ins. Co., 850 So. 2d 555, 561 (Fla. 4th DCA

2003) (“[The insurer] could have elected to follow a strategy of settlement

with selected claimants, if that policy were reasonable. The reasonableness

of that policy is also a question for the jury[.]”); Moultrop v. GEICO Gen.

Ins. Co., 304 So. 3d 1, 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020) (“[T]he question of whether

an insurer has acted in bad faith in handling claims against the insured is

determined under the ‘totality of the circumstances standard.’”); Harvey v.

GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 259 So. 3d 1, 7 (Fla. 2018) (“[T]he focus in a bad

faith case is not on the actions of the claimant but rather on those of the

insurer in fulfilling its obligations to the insured.” (quoting Harvey v. GEICO

Gen. Ins. Co., 259 So. 3d 1,7 (Fla. 2018))).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harmon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
232 So. 2d 206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Suzanne Harvey, etc. v. Geico General Insurance Company
259 So. 3d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)
Farinas v. Florida Farm Bureau General Insurance Co.
850 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Progressive Express Insurance Company v. Olivia Oney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/progressive-express-insurance-company-v-olivia-oney-fladistctapp-2025.