Progress for Michigan 2020 v. Cyndee Jonseck
This text of Progress for Michigan 2020 v. Cyndee Jonseck (Progress for Michigan 2020 v. Cyndee Jonseck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
September 10, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 161968 & (24) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein PROGRESS FOR MICHIGAN 2020, Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiff-Appellee, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices
v SC: 161968 COA: 354726 St. Clair CC: 20-001331-AW CYNDEE JONSECK, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 8, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for peremptory relief is DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 10, 2020 s0910 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Progress for Michigan 2020 v. Cyndee Jonseck, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/progress-for-michigan-2020-v-cyndee-jonseck-mich-2020.