Proffitt v. Cipolla

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6176

WILBERT EUGENE PROFFITT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RICHARD CIPOLLA, United States Probation Officer; EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., Chairman, United States Parole Commission; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:07- cv-03377-JFM)

Submitted: May 29, 2008 Decided: June 4, 2008

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilbert Eugene Proffitt, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wilbert Eugene Proffitt seeks to appeal the district

court’s order transferring Proffitt’s civil case to the United

States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. This

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Proffitt seeks

to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory

or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -