Professional Beauty Federation of California v. Gavin Newsom

• Court: District Court, C.D. California
• Decided: May 20, 2020
• Docket: 2:20-cv-04275
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. 2:20-cv-04275-RGK-AS Date May 20, 2020 Title Professional Beauty Federation of California, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al

Present: The Honorable R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Sharon L. Williams Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause

On May 19, 2020, Plaintiffs filed an Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). On May 20, 2020, the Government filed an Opposition. Upon review, the Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to show cause as to why the Court should not construe Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application as a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. See Dilworth v. Riner, 343 F.2d 226, 229 (Sth Cir. 1965) (“where the opposing party has notice of the application for a temporary restraiming order... such order does not differ functionally from a preliminary injunction|.]”); see also E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump, 932 F.3d 742, 763 (9th Cir. 2018). Plaintiffs shall file a brief not to exceed 3 pages no later than May 22, 2020. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Preparer

CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1