Profectus Technology LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co.

Federal Circuit

Profectus Technology LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co.

653 F. App'x 906

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided May 26, 2016·No. 2015-1016, 2015-1018, 2015-1019·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam.

On October 27, 2015, we ordered the parties to prepare to show cause at oral argument as to why sanctions should not be imposed for violation of Federal Circuit Rule 28(d).'The parties addressed the issue of sanctions at oral argument and refiled corrected briefing and appendices following oral argument. Regarding the show-cause order on October 27, 2015, we decline to impose sanctions for violation of Federal Circuit Rule 28(d).

It Is Okdbred That:

Sanctions are not imposed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam.

On October 27, 2015, we ordered the parties to prepare to show cause at oral argument as to why sanctions should not be imposed for violation of Federal Circuit Rule 28(d).'The parties addressed the issue of sanctions at oral argument and refiled corrected briefing and appendices following oral argument. Regarding the show-cause order on October 27, 2015, we decline to impose sanctions for violation of Federal Circuit Rule 28(d).

It Is Okdbred That:

Sanctions are not imposed.

Profectus Technology LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., 653 F. App'x 906 (Fed. Cir. 2016).

Pincite

653 F. App'x 906 (Profectus Technology LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.