Profectus Technology LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co.

Federal Circuit

Profectus Technology LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co.

653 F. App'x 906

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMay 26, 2016

Docket2015-1016, 2015-1018, 2015-1019

StatusPublished

This text of 653 F. App'x 906 (Profectus Technology LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Profectus Technology LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., 653 F. App'x 906 (Fed. Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam.

On October 27, 2015, we ordered the parties to prepare to show cause at oral argument as to why sanctions should not be imposed for violation of Federal Circuit Rule 28(d).'The parties addressed the issue of sanctions at oral argument and refiled corrected briefing and appendices following oral argument. Regarding the show-cause order on October 27, 2015, we decline to impose sanctions for violation of Federal Circuit Rule 28(d).

It Is Okdbred That:

Sanctions are not imposed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam.

On October 27, 2015, we ordered the parties to prepare to show cause at oral argument as to why sanctions should not be imposed for violation of Federal Circuit Rule 28(d).'The parties addressed the issue of sanctions at oral argument and refiled corrected briefing and appendices following oral argument. Regarding the show-cause order on October 27, 2015, we decline to impose sanctions for violation of Federal Circuit Rule 28(d).

It Is Okdbred That:

Sanctions are not imposed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

653 F. App'x 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/profectus-technology-llc-v-huawei-technologies-co-cafc-2016.