Procunier v. Bye
420 U.S. 996, 95 S. Ct. 1437
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 24, 1975·No. No. 74-615·Published·Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Procunier v. Bye, 420 U.S. 996, 95 S. Ct. 1437 (1975).
420 U.S. 996 (Procunier v. Bye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barnes v. Superior Court
186 Cal. App. 3d 969 (California Court of Appeal, 1986)
People v. Harris
165 Cal. App. 3d 1246 (California Court of Appeal, 1985)
United States v. Ellerbee
481 A.2d 473 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1984)
Fort v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance
136 Cal. App. 3d 12 (California Court of Appeal, 1982)
C.R., Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. David Arthur Adams, Individually and in His Capacity as Judicial Hospitalization Referee, Michael v. Reagen, Charles Palmer, and Candiah Thiagarajah
649 F.2d 625 (Eighth Circuit, 1981)
C.R. v. Adams
649 F.2d 625 (Eighth Circuit, 1981)
State v. Grimme
274 N.W.2d 331 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1979)
People v. Ely
76 Cal. App. 3d 1006 (California Court of Appeal, 1978)
MATTER OF SPEED v. Regan
369 N.E.2d 1189 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
People v. Quintana
69 Cal. App. 3d 178 (California Court of Appeal, 1977)