Proctor v. Wiegold

5 Conn. Super. Ct. 73
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided April 27, 1937·No. File No. 33805, # 33349·Published

Opinion

To the original complaints sounding in negligence, the plaintiff seeks to add by amendment a second count. The proposed amendment prays for the setting aside of a conveyance for fraud on the plaintiff. The propriety of including such a count in this suit is questioned by the defendants. This raises an issue of law which may not be decided on a motion to amend but should be squarely raised by demurrer.

Newman vs. Golden, 108 Conn. 676, 679. Smith vs. Furness, 117 Conn. 97, 100.

The motions to amend are granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proctor v. Wiegold, 5 Conn. Super. Ct. 73 (Colo. Ct. App. 1937).

5 Conn. Super. Ct. 73 (Proctor v. Wiegold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newman v. Golden
144 A. 467 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1929)
Smith v. Furness
166 A. 759 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1933)