Proctor v. Wiegold
5 Conn. Super. Ct. 73
Opinion
To the original complaints sounding in negligence, the plaintiff seeks to add by amendment a second count. The proposed amendment prays for the setting aside of a conveyance for fraud on the plaintiff. The propriety of including such a count in this suit is questioned by the defendants. This raises an issue of law which may not be decided on a motion to amend but should be squarely raised by demurrer.
Newman vs. Golden,
The motions to amend are granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Proctor v. Wiegold, 5 Conn. Super. Ct. 73 (Colo. Ct. App. 1937).
5 Conn. Super. Ct. 73 (Proctor v. Wiegold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Newman v. Golden
144 A. 467 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1929)
Smith v. Furness
166 A. 759 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1933)