Proctor v. Weigold

Connecticut Superior Court

Proctor v. Weigold

5 Conn. Supp. 73, 1937 Conn. Super. LEXIS 50

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedApril 27, 1937

DocketFile #33805; #33349

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Conn. Supp. 73 (Proctor v. Weigold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Proctor v. Weigold, 5 Conn. Supp. 73, 1937 Conn. Super. LEXIS 50 (Colo. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

JENNINGS, J.

To the original complaints sounding in negligence, the plaintiff seeks to add by amendment a second count. The proposed amendment prays for the setting aside of a conveyance for fraud on the plaintiff. The propriety of including such a count in this suit is questioned by the defendants. This raises an issue of law which may not be decided on a motion to amend but should be squarely raised by demurrer.

Newman vs. Golden, 108 Conn. 676, 679.

Smith vs. Furness, 117 Conn. 97, 100.

The motions to amend are granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI