Proctor v. State

318 S.W.3d 771, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1122, 2010 WL 3394683
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 31, 2010·No. WD 71538·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

We are not left with the definite and firm impression that the motion court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing on Proctor’s Rule 24.035 motion was a mistake. The court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. The denial of Proctor’s post-conviction relief motion is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proctor v. State, 318 S.W.3d 771, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1122, 2010 WL 3394683 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

318 S.W.3d 771 (Proctor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farris v. State
318 S.W.3d 771 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)