Proctor v. Mutual Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Proctor v. Mutual Life Insurance

246 A.D. 573

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Action to recover under the double indemnity provisions of certain policies of insurance issued by defendant upon the life of plaintiff’s husband. The overwhelming evidence established the fact of suicide. While there were errors in the admission and exclusion of evidence, we are of opinion that even if they had been avoided, no different verdict would have been reached by the jury. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover under the double indemnity provisions of certain policies of insurance issued by defendant upon the life of plaintiff’s husband. The overwhelming evidence established the fact of suicide. While there were errors in the admission and exclusion of evidence, we are of opinion that even if they had been avoided, no different verdict would have been reached by the jury. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Glennon, JJ.

Proctor v. Mutual Life Insurance, 246 A.D. 573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 573 (Proctor v. Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.