Proctor v. Kansas City Heart Group, P.C.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Proctor v. Kansas City Heart Group, P.C.

410 S.W.3d 710, 2013 WL 5460124, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1147

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 1, 2013·No. No. WD 75427·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Bobbie Proctor appeals from a judgment entered in favor of the defendants in her medical malpractice action against Dr. Timothy Blackburn and the Kansas City Heart Group, P.C. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, the trial court did not abuse its discretion, and no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Bobbie Proctor appeals from a judgment entered in favor of the defendants in her medical malpractice action against Dr. Timothy Blackburn and the Kansas City Heart Group, P.C. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, the trial court did not abuse its discretion, and no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Proctor v. Kansas City Heart Group, P.C., 410 S.W.3d 710, 2013 WL 5460124, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1147 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

410 S.W.3d 710 (Proctor v. Kansas City Heart Group, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.