Proctor v. Heyer

122 Mass. 525, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 174
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMay 4, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 122 Mass. 525 (Proctor v. Heyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Proctor v. Heyer, 122 Mass. 525, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 174 (Mass. 1877).

Opinion

Colt, J.

The plaintiffs, trustees under the will of William A. Heyer, ask the direction of this court in the discharge of their trust. By the terms of the will, full power is given to them, as trustees, to sell the real estate devised “ on such terms and in such manner, and at such time or times, as they may think most advisable.” From the proceeds of the estate they are required to set apart funds for the benefit of the testator’s wife and mother, the incomes of which are to be paid to them, respectively, during life. The whole estate goes ultimately to the children and heirs at law.

The estate is still unsettled in the hands of the executor. The two years given to creditors for bringing actions, and within which legatees can only obtain payment by giving bonds of indemnity, have not expired. Gen. Sts. c. 97, §§ 5, 21. On account of mortgages assumed by the testator on land, the value of which is unknown, the liabilities of the estate are yet uncertain, and the executor is unwilling to close his administration and surrender the estate.

To these requests for instructions, the first answer is that it does not yet appear that there will be any estate remaining for the trustees after payment of debts, with reference to which the questions suggested can arise. There is no fund which they can be said yet to hold as trustees, in the administration of which these questions have arisen.

[529]*529The other answer is, that there is no question of law here piesented to the court. The questions relate to the administration of a trust, in respect to matters which the testator has expressly-confided to the wise discretion of trustees selected by himself. There is no suggestion, from any quarter, that they are likely to abuse that trust, by an arbitrary or capricious exercise of authority. The judgment of this court cannot be substituted for the discretion of the trustees, reasonably and fairly exercised. Amery v. Green, 13 Allen, 413. Walker v. Shore, 19 Ves. 387, 392. Bill dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Messer
34 Misc. 2d 416 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1962)
Raffety v. Parker
241 F.2d 594 (Eighth Circuit, 1957)
Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Johnson
96 N.E.2d 155 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1951)
McMahon v. Krapf
80 N.E.2d 314 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1948)
Sylvester v. Newton
73 N.E.2d 585 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1947)
Young v. Jackson
71 N.E.2d 386 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1947)
Sears v. Childs
35 N.E.2d 663 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Dumaine v. Dumaine
16 N.E.2d 625 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1938)
Hull v. Adams
190 N.E. 510 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
McCarthy v. Tierney
165 A. 807 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1933)
Eustace v. Dickey
132 N.E. 852 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)
Hill v. Moors
224 Mass. 163 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)
Leverett v. Barnwell
214 Mass. 105 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)
Sells v. Delgado
70 N.E. 1036 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)
Dickey v. Barnstable
98 N.W. 368 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1904)
Hall v. Cogswell
67 N.E. 644 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)
Caspari v. Cutcheon
67 N.W. 1093 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1896)
Tilden v. Green
7 N.Y.S. 382 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 Mass. 525, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/proctor-v-heyer-mass-1877.