Procter v. Commissioner

323 U.S. 756, 65 S. Ct. 90
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 23, 1944
DocketNo. 376
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 323 U.S. 756 (Procter v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Procter v. Commissioner, 323 U.S. 756, 65 S. Ct. 90 (1944).

Opinion

Petition for writ of cer[757]*757tiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Frederic W. Procter, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Samuel O. Clark, Jr., and Messrs. Sewall Key, J. Louis Monarch, and Carlton Fox for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Rose
58 Misc. 2d 576 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
323 U.S. 756, 65 S. Ct. 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/procter-v-commissioner-scotus-1944.