Procter & Gamble Co. v. Rna Corp.

Federal Circuit

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Rna Corp.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJuly 8, 2009

Docket2009-1226

StatusUnpublished

This text of Procter & Gamble Co. v. Rna Corp. (Procter & Gamble Co. v. Rna Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Rna Corp., (Fed. Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1226

PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RNA CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Peter M. Lancaster, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Heather D. Redmond.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

Judge Thomas M. Rose NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1226

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

in CASE NO(S). 1:08-CV-565.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MAYER, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges )

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED July 8, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI