Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Procter & Gamble Co. v. Powell

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Powell

462 So. 2d 1215, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 370, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12324
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 11, 1985
DocketNo. BD-138
StatusPublished

This text of 462 So. 2d 1215 (Procter & Gamble Co. v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Powell, 462 So. 2d 1215, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 370, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12324 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On petition for writ of common law cer-tiorari, the only issue before us is whether the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by ordering the discovery of documents furnished from outside researchers to Procter & Gamble Company. This issue is controlled by Procter & Gamble v. Swilley, 462 So.2d 1188 (1985), in which this court upheld the trial court’s order permitting respondents to discover such research and related documents.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

ERVIN, C.J., and L. SMITH and NIM-MONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Swilley
462 So. 2d 1188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
462 So. 2d 1215, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 370, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/procter-gamble-co-v-powell-fladistctapp-1985.