Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Prock v. State

Prock v. State

696 So. 2d 1293, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8152, 1997 WL 394841
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 16, 1997
DocketNo. 95-04353
StatusPublished

This text of 696 So. 2d 1293 (Prock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prock v. State, 696 So. 2d 1293, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8152, 1997 WL 394841 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ruth Bates Prock pleaded nolo contendere to the manufacture of cannabis and was sentenced to eighteen months probation. We have reviewed this ease according to our obhgation under In re Anders Briefs, 581 So.2d 149 (Fla.1991), and affirm Prock’s judgment. We strike from her sentence, however, the $2 cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), because it was not orally imposed at the [1294]*1294sentencing hearing. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 117 (Fla. 2d DCA1995).

Affirmed as modified.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Anders Briefs
581 So. 2d 149 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
696 So. 2d 1293, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8152, 1997 WL 394841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prock-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.