Home/New York Court of Appeals/Procida v. City of New York

Procida v. City of New York

269 N.E.2d 399, 28 N.Y.2d 681, 320 N.Y.S.2d 737, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1476
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 3, 1971
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 N.E.2d 399 (Procida v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Procida v. City of New York, 269 N.E.2d 399, 28 N.Y.2d 681, 320 N.Y.S.2d 737, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1476 (N.Y. 1971).

Opinions

Order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that a prima facie case of negligence was made out. There was adequate evidence of notice, which the jury was warranted in accepting, adduced largely from city employees and city records.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Bebgan, Bbeitel and Gibson. Judge Jasen dissents and votes to affirm in the following opinion in which Judge Scileppi concurs. Taking no part: Judge Bubke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hulsman v. Hemmeter Development Corp.
647 P.2d 713 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 N.E.2d 399, 28 N.Y.2d 681, 320 N.Y.S.2d 737, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/procida-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1971.