Procida v. City of New York
269 N.E.2d 399, 28 N.Y.2d 681, 320 N.Y.S.2d 737, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1476
Opinions
Order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that a prima facie case of negligence was made out. There was adequate evidence of notice, which the jury was warranted in accepting, adduced largely from city employees and city records.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Bebgan, Bbeitel and Gibson. Judge Jasen dissents and votes to affirm in the following opinion in which Judge Scileppi concurs. Taking no part: Judge Bubke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Procida v. City of New York, 269 N.E.2d 399, 28 N.Y.2d 681, 320 N.Y.S.2d 737, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1476 (N.Y. 1971).
269 N.E.2d 399 (Procida v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hulsman v. Hemmeter Development Corp.
647 P.2d 713 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1982)